Challenge who rules to change the rules: Women, sport and leadership in Australia
Jeanes
This article was co-authored with Jerril Rechter, the CEO of Basketball Australia.
The theme of International Women’s Day 2021, “Women in Leadership: Achieving an equal future in a COVID-19 world”, is a pertinent one for sport, with the sector remaining woefully backward in supporting women leaders.
While participation in sport by women is growing, with more women and girls playing a breadth of sports, the number of women taking on senior leadership roles in sport remains low.
Over the past year, COVID-19 has unravelled so much of the momentum of the successes of women in the sports sector. It’s revealed the fragility of women’s progress in sport as part of the broader societal impact of the pandemic that has disproportionately affected women in all walks of life.
Elite and grassroots women’s sport has endured reductions in funding, cancellation of fixtures, seasons and tournaments, with limited efforts to reconfigure sporting activity to the same extent we witnessed was possible with many men’s sports.
COVID-19 provided a stark illustration of what’s important in sport – and it wasn’t women.
COVID-19 provided a stark illustration of what’s important in sport – and it wasn’t women.
Two years ago, women leaders were finally securing leadership positions across the sports sector in roles that were previously held by men – notably Raelene Castle (Rugby Australia), Kate Palmer (Sport Australia) and Leigh Russell (Swimming Australia).
Since then, Castle, Palmer and Russell have stepped down from these high-profile positions, and the stats haven’t shifted in terms of women leading national sporting organisations and taking on other key roles in sport.
In 2021, there are no women CEOs leading sports that are part of the coalition of major professional and participation sports (which includes netball – the CEO role is currently vacant – tennis, rugby union, rugby league, football, the AFL, and cricket), and across other national sporting associations (including disability sporting associations), just 23% have women in senior leadership roles (CEO or equivalent).
The lack of women in leadership is illustrative of a culture that continues to celebrate and prioritise masculinity, and a lack of individual responsibility by those in power to be willing to give up a system that’s benefited them.
Women struggle to gain access to significant leadership opportunities, but when they do, they generally enter a hostile, masculinised environment where they’re disproportionately scrutinised and their abilities questioned, and even their appearances criticised.
Since departing Rugby Australia, Raelene Castle has been open about the overt sexism and misogyny she was subjected to, while chairman Paul McLean has stated she endured abhorrent bullying during her tenure.
These conditions are unlikely to sustain or increase the number of women taking on leadership positions in sport.
Elite women’s sport is finally gaining recognition in Australian society, with athletes such as Tayla Harris, Ash Barty, Elyse Perry and Liz Cambage becoming household names.
Australian women sporting teams have achieved success equal to, or above, their male counterparts, and this is finally being acknowledged. Australia’s cricketers were the 2020 ICC World Cup champions; the Opals (basketball) have regularly gained top-three positions at world championships and the Olympics over the past 10 years; the Diamonds (netball) have been consistently successful on the world stage; and the Matildas (soccer) are ranked seventh in the world.
Yet our leading women athletes continually experience discrimination and abuse. We see the vitriol directed at the Opals’ Liz Cambage when she plays. One of the world’s most successful athletes, Serena Williams, suffers constant animosity – she’s criticised as being too aggressive, too masculine or, conversely, too emotional and petulant. The iconic Cathy Freeman recently outlined the racial discrimination throughout her career, including receiving racist hate mail.
All these women have been trailblazers that others have emulated to lift their codes to new levels. For these athletes, sexism intertwines with racism, creating powerful forms of oppression that diverts attention from their phenomenal athletic achievements.
So when are we going to systematically challenge the structures and culture of sport that favour men and diminish women?
Studies in community sport suggest a business rationale is a strong motivator for clubs to embrace diversity. However, the bigger question is, why do we need a business case when to excel in a chosen field of human endeavour – whether sport, science or otherwise – isn’t gender-specific.
To claim an equal future in sport, we have to shift the dial and support women leaders at all levels of the sport ecosystem. More of the same will not cut it. We cannot keep putting a handful of talented women in leadership positions and hope that by osmosis, structural and cultural change will follow.
Proactive change is needed
We must proactively change the structures and culture at the same time as elevating more women to leadership and, crucially, supporting those in high-profile roles.
We need to embrace our elite women athletes, and appreciate and celebrate their skills and strengths, not discriminate against and demean them because they don’t fit meaningless stereotypes that have no place in contemporary society.
There’s no silver bullet. As our research in community sport indicates, changing gendered structures and culture takes time, often decades.
Let this decade be the one where we maintain the momentum for change, and challenge who rules in sports across Australia.
About the Authors
-
Ruth jeanes
Professor, sport, physical activity and social exclusion, Faculty of Education, Monash University
Ruth is a Professor and Head of the School of Curriculum, Teaching and Inclusive Education within the Faculty of Education at Monash University. She is a sociologist and her research aims to address inequity and discrimination within sport, as well as examining the role of sport in addressing complex social and health issues. She is currently working on two ARC-funded research projects examining the role of informal sport in creating healthy and socially cohesive communities and a further project examining ongoing gender inequities within Australian sport. Ruth's research has attracted a range of external funding. She is lead investigator on a recently awarded ARC Linkage grant 'Informal sport as a health and social resources amongst diverse young people' ($250,000) with co-investigators Dr Justen O' Connor, Professor Dawn Penney and Professor Ramon Spaaij and in partnership with VicHealth, Centre for Multicultural Youth, Cricket Victoria and the Department of local governernment, sport and cultural industries. This study builds on a recently completed project also funded by the ARC Linkage scheme ($200,000) for a project 'Participation versus performance: Managing (dis) ability, gender and cultural diversity in Junior Sport'. The grant team was led by Professor Ramon Spaaij from Victoria University. Methodologically Ruth seeks to give voice to disempowered individuals and communities within her research by drawing on a range of participatory approaches developed from her PhD. Ruth's PhD thesis utilised feminist post-structuralism to examine the role of sport and specifically soccer in the construction of girls' gender identities and she has developed this area to research and continues to publish on how constructions of gender and sport can facilitate and constrain girls' involvement in sport. More recently, Ruth's research has examined the role of sport in assisting young homeless men to connect with support services, to support identity (re) construction amongst men experiencing mental illness, and the ways in which newly arrived and refugee committees use sport when settling in Australia. Ruth has an ongoing interest in examining the experiences of young people with disabilities in sport and leisure contexts. Internationally she has undertaken extensive research work in Zambia, examining the role of sport in HIV/AIDS education as a tool to empower young women and as means to foster hope and a sense of community amongst both men and women living in highly impoverished urban compounds. Ruth regularly conducts evaluations examining the impact of sport and social change initiatives for national and international agencies including UNICEF, the Football Foundation and Centre for Multicultural Youth. Ruth is President of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Leisure Studies and is a member of several journal editorial boards including the International Review for the Sociology of Sport, Sociology of Sport Journal, Managing Sport and Leisure and Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. Research interests Sport and international development Social policy and sport Coaching and community development Gender, sport and physical education Research methodologies and young people Young people with disabilities, family and leisure
Other stories you might like
-
Listening to women in grassroots leadership in a COVID-19 world
Women have been fighting poverty pay, long hours and unsafe working conditions long before COVID-19 hit.
-
AFL bridges cultures in Java
Ana Surjanto is exploring links to culture through language and sport to inspire her students with new confidence.
-
Where are all the female leaders?
They account for more than 50 per cent of medical graduates, but women still face stiff opposition rising to the top of their profession.