Published Sep 22 2021

Injecting hope: A game-changing treatment in the opioid-dependence fight

Launched in Melbourne in 2001, International Overdose Awareness Day – which was marked on 31 August – is the world’s largest annual campaign to end overdose.

It’s a day to remember those who have lost their lives, and acknowledge the grief of family, friends and loved ones left behind.

It aims to address stigma, stimulate discussion about overdose prevention and drug policy, and inform people around the world about the risk of overdose.

Opioids – illicit drugs such as heroin, and pain relievers such as codeine, oxycodone and morphine – are the major contributors to overdose deaths in Australia, highlighting the need to upscale interventions that help reduce opioid-related harm and mortality.

One important established intervention is opiate agonist therapy, which helps prevent withdrawal and reduce cravings for opioid drugs, and has been shown to be effective in improving wellbeing, and reducing illicit opiate use and overdose mortality.

The therapy involves taking the medications methadone or buprenorphine, and helps people addicted to opioid drugs to stabilise their lives and reduce the harms associated with their drug use.

However, one drawback of opiate agonist therapy is the need to attend pharmacies or clinics several times a week to receive medication. These frequent dosing requirements can reinforce stigma, and make it difficult for patients to engage in other activities.

A long-acting solution

A new formulation of buprenorphine has recently been launched, and promises to improve the treatment of opioid dependence. This long-acting injectable depot slowly releases over the course of a week or month to block the effects of opioid use.

A recent study published in Drug and Alcohol Dependence, led by Turning Point, Monash University and The University of Sydney, found that long-acting injectable buprenorphine may bring many benefits for patients, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when access to in-person services has been constrained.


Read more: The uncomfortable truth about drug overdose and suicide


While there’s a growing body of evidence that long-acting injectable buprenorphine delivered via a weekly or monthly injection is effective to treat opioid dependence, how patients experience it is uncertain.

In this world-first study, researchers conducted interviews with 30 patients in Victoria and New South Wales who had recently been prescribed long-acting injectable buprenorphine.

Benefits for patients

Long-acting injectable buprenorphine led to benefits for many patients, including opportunities to avoid stigma experienced at pharmacies or clinics by not having to attend daily; time to engage in other activities (such as travel, work, study, caregiving) by releasing participants from previous strict treatment regimens; and cost savings by not having to pay pharmacy fees associated with daily dosing.

Additionally, for many participants, being released from past, strict daily-dosing treatment regimens allowed them to form a new sense of self and a “freedom” to move forward in life.

“It’s absolutely freed up so much of my time, and I’m not tied to the clinic. I feel like I’ve got more control over my life which is a good thing,” said Justine* who had recently been prescribed long-acting injectable buprenorphine.

However, for some patients who were particularly marginalised, moving to long-acting injectable buprenorphine disrupted engagements with important social and practical supports available at pharmacies or clinics, and constrained their control over their own dosing.


Read more: By the double: COVID-19, opioids, and the threat of a syndemic


Monash Addiction Research Centre and Turning Point director and addiction psychiatrist Professor Dan Lubman, who led the study, said: “This new treatment option is a real game-changer for so many patients, freeing them up to work, study and travel, and reducing the level of stigma experienced.

“However, we need to make sure that those who need additional support are not disadvantaged.”

The findings of the study indicate that while long-acting injectable buprenorphine has benefits for many patients, some will require extra support when moving onto this new treatment.

Having the choice of alternate medications is timely; however, taking a patient-centred approach remains key in determining whether long-acting injectable buprenorphine is the right treatment option.

* Pseudonyms are used to protect the identity of participants.

 

About the Authors

  • Tony barnett

    Research Fellow, Clinical and Social Research team, Turning Point and Monash Addiction Research Centre

    Tony joined Turning Point in 2018. Working in the clinical and social research team, his work explores the social and cultural contexts of alcohol and other drug use, treatment (including novel therapeutic interventions) and policy change.

  • Dan lubman

    Professor Addiction Studies and Services, Monash University and Director, Turning Point and Monash Addiction Research Centre

    Dan has worked across mental health and drug treatment settings in the UK and Australia. His research includes investigating the harms associated with alcohol, drugs and gambling, the impact of alcohol and drug use on brain function, the relationship between substance use, gambling and mental disorder, as well as the development of targeted telephone, online and face-to-face intervention programs within school, primary care, mental health and drug treatment settings.

  • Michael savic

    Senior Research Fellow, Turning Point and Monash Addiction Research Centre

    Dr Michael Savic is a Senior Research Fellow in Addiction Studies at the Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, and Strategic Lead of Clinical and Social Research at Turning Point, Eastern Health. Michael’s research focuses on the social and cultural contexts of alcohol and other drug use, addiction concepts, treatment and experiences of intervention implementation and care across several mediums. His research is multi-disciplinary in orientation, policy and practice relevant, and often draws on critical approaches and qualitative methods. He coordinates units in the Monash University Master of Addictive Behaviours and is a Culture and Policy Theme leader at the Monash Addiction Research Centre. Michael is a co-convener of the Victorian Substance Use Research Forum, an Associate Editor at the International Journal of Drug Policy, and a Deputy Editor at Drug and Alcohol Review.

Other stories you might like