How health and safety are compromised for people living with long COVID and intimate partner violence
Fitz-Gibbon
What happens when a person is experiencing long COVID and intimate partner violence at the same time? There’s been no attention paid to this question anywhere in the world since the onset of the pandemic in 2020.
This is staggering, given previous research shows women who are victim-survivors of intimate partner violence are twice as likely to develop long-term illnesses, including chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia.
The World Health Organisation defines long COVID as the continuation, or development of new symptoms three months after the initial COVID infection. Global studies estimate one in 10 infected people go on to develop long COVID symptoms.
Our research reveals the previously unseen impacts of long COVID on individuals experiencing domestic violence. We found that each of these conditions worsened an individual’s experience of the other.
Our study
We conducted an anonymous online survey between April and October 2023 with 28 Australian adults affected by intimate partner violence and diagnosed with long COVID. The survey asked participants about the impact of long COVID on their experiences of intimate partner violence, as well as about their safety and support needs.
The majority of survey participants (18 of the 28) identified as female and as heterosexual (21 of 28). Most participants were between 31 and 50 years old, and identified English as the main language spoken at home.
The majority of respondents contracted long COVID in 2022 and had experienced symptoms for more than a year. Three-quarters of them said long COVID “significantly” affected their day-to-day functioning.
Experiences of partner abuse since contracting long COVID
Thirteen participants had experienced abuse in the relationship prior to their diagnosis with long COVID. Another seven experienced abuse for the first time following their long COVID diagnosis. These victim-survivors talked about the abuse beginning as their health deteriorated.
One participant described:
“I think the illness on top of my other conditions made him perceive me as more of a burden, leading to poor behaviour. There were a few signs of this prior to my having COVID, but I think my being vulnerable when I had previously been the ‘strong’ and ‘independent’ partner really threw him off, and he rejected that.”
Another victim-survivor put the rapid increase in abuse down to the difficult social conditions of living through lockdowns and in isolation:
“[The pandemic] gave us too much time to know so much about each other. That worsened the abusive tendencies.”
Eighteen survey participants believed contracting long COVID had put them at higher risk of abuse due to a range of factors, including reduced brain functioning, low self-worth, social isolation associated with COVID restrictions, and the burden of care placed on their partners.
As two victim-survivors described:
“My self-worth has decreased and my need for help and support has increased. He makes me feel like I need him.
“I seemed to be a burden at all times.”
Several participants said they were too unwell as a result of long COVID to even consider leaving their abusive partner. As two participants commented:
“I felt that I had no choice but to stay. I can’t handle another huge change or unknown.”
It [long COVID] makes me feel helpless. My health is my ticket to a better life. I’m not actioning my thoughts to leave as it all seems too big, too messy. I won’t cope physically or mentally. I cannot take care of five children on my own.”
Victim-survivors who had not separated from their abusive partner acknowledged it would be impossible to recover physically from long COVID while continuing to experience intimate partner violence.
Read more: I have COVID. How likely am I to get long COVID?
The weaponisation of long COVID symptoms
Victim-survivors described how their partners weaponised or manipulated their long COVID symptoms to perpetrate abusive behaviours. Perpetrators exploited the mental and physical impacts of long COVID to further entrap victim-survivors in coercively controlling relationships.
One victim-survivor described their partner in the following way:
“... yelling and pushing due to me not knowing what I want to say quickly and words getting muddled up.”
Another victim-survivor lost their sex drive, a well-documented symptom of long COVID, which led to their abuser shifting towards sexually abusive behaviours.
Missed opportunities
Many victim-survivors in this study talked about missed opportunities for intervention by health professionals. One in five victim-survivors surveyed said they were never asked about violence by a medical professional.
Several participants also said family violence support services were partially or completely inaccessible due to their long COVID symptoms. One victim-survivor commented:
“Nothing was able to be provided in a practical sense. The best that could be done is acknowledging that there’s a gap in services.”
Several victim-survivors who accessed support did so via phone or web chat. This is unsurprising given the health vulnerabilities of victim-survivors experiencing long COVID. But it highlights the importance of continued funding for the delivery of remote domestic violence supports and healthcare services across Australia.
Read more: How technology can help victims of intimate partner violence
Supporting the safety and recovery needs of all victim-survivors
Our study provides critical information relevant to the continued implementation of the Australian government’s National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children, as well as ongoing public health policy and practice in all Australian states and territories.
The unique experiences of victim-survivors with long COVID and other chronic health conditions must be recognised and addressed across the spectrum of prevention, early intervention, response and recovery efforts.
In this study, victim-survivors commonly described losing control of their health and then losing control of their safety within their relationship. Addressing this issue requires workers responding to domestic violence to be alive to the complex intersection of chronic illness, ableism, and gender-based violence.
This article originally appeared on The Conversation.
About the Authors
-
Kate fitz-gibbon
Professor (Practice), Corporate Education, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University
Kate is an international research leader in the area of domestic and family violence, femicide, responses to all forms of violence against women and children, perpetrator interventions, and the impacts of policy and practice reform in Australia and internationally. She has significant experience with qualitative and survey-based research methods, and a strong record of conducting research that ethically and safely engages with family violence victim-survivors, people who use violence, and practitioners.
-
Naomi pfitzner
Research Fellow, Criminology
Naomi has extensive research experience in family violence prevention and response. She conducts research in the area of family violence, gender, family studies, social policy and law. Her work has a key focus on the primary prevention of family violence. Naomi’s doctoral research examined men’s engagement with intimate partner violence primary prevention programs. More recently, she conducted a commissioned evaluation of a family violence workforce capacity building project in the Victorian social services sector. Naomi was also engaged by Our Watch to evaluate a family violence primary prevention intervention targeting parents.
-
Jasmine mcgowan
Lecturer, Criminology, Faculty of Arts
Jasmine is a lecturer in the Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre. Her research focuses on gendered violence, disability and violence, disability hate crime, economic abuse, intimate partner homicide, perpetrator interventions, and processes of knowledge translation and exchange for policy relevant research.
-
Benjamin scott
Teaching and Research Associate, Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre, Faculty of Arts, Monash University
Ben is a Criminology Honours graduate from Monash University. Ben’s research interests include family violence, and policing theory, grounded in a critical, queer criminological perspective.
Other stories you might like
-
Tackling ‘toxic masculinity’ in Australia: We can’t afford to get this wrong
The federal government’s announcement of $3.5 million to fund a healthy masculinities project trial is promising, but lacks detail on precisely how the funds will be used, and what will inform the programs.
-
Affirmative consent: What is it?
Despite ongoing efforts to shift cultural thinking, coercive sexual behaviours and misunderstanding regarding consent remains a concerning social problem.
-
Will the government’s action plans to end violence against women and children be enough?
While the actions outlined in the plans are admirable, achieving the set targets will require a significant increase in urgency and funding.
-
Violence against women: More deaths, little action
Despite a national plan to end violence against women and children, there’s no demonstrable evidence of a change of pace, or the emergency interventions needed, to achieve it.