A parliamentary committee has recommended a dedicated act to protect human rights. Here’s how it could work.
Politicians have cynically used metaphor to imply meaning through language.
Human rights legislation is a normal part of living in a modern democratic country, but Australia still doesn’t have a legal framework that supports everyone living here.
Why did so many people choose to trust the Robodebt automated system over the drumbeat of criticism that it was unlawful, and its outcomes flawed?
What conditions give rise to so many people effectively consenting to large-scale harm within a democracy?
Dummy text
