Mental health scare: Women falling through the cracks
Teede
The recent decision by the federal government to reduce subsidised mental health sessions from 20 down to 10 has attracted criticism. While on face value this decision may appear to limit access to mental health care, it’s actually a step in the right direction towards equity-focused mental healthcare reform.
Australia’s mental health system is broken, costs $11 billion annually, and needs reform, says Graham Meadows, psychiatrist and Adjunct Professor in Monash University’s Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences.
“It currently better-serves the well-off, often failing to reach the groups who need it most,” he says.
Women have the highest level of mental health distress in Australia
One of the largest groups missing out are women, particularly underserved women, who are the fastest-growing group reporting mental health distress.
We examined two decades of mental health data and found that gender and financial inequity are significant contributors to mental distress, with Australian women reporting poorer health and greater psychological distress than men.
Mental health distress in Australia has, since 2001, risen sharply in women aged between 55 and 64. While younger women reported the highest distress in all years since 2001, older women went from the lowest to the second-highest in 2018.
Very high levels of distress illustrate the effect of socioeconomic disadvantage even more starkly. For instance, 0.4% Australian men in the highest income quintile reported high levels of distress, while for women in the lowest quintile it’s 11.9%. That’s a 28-fold difference.
“Supporting women’s mental health will require much more than providing individual mental health services, regardless of the number of sessions.” says Dr Joanne Enticott, Senior Research Fellow with the Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation.
“We need to deliver expanded and equity-focused health system reform, as well as addressing broader root causes of mental health distress.”
According to the World Health Organisation, these root causes include exposure to unfavourable social, economic, geopolitical and environmental circumstances – including poverty, violence, inequality, and environmental deprivation.
The role of financial inequity in mental health
We demonstrate that it will take 200 years for women to catch up to men in addressing the gender pay gap, and structural inequities in the superannuation system have yet to be addressed.
Women aged 50 to 65 represent the fastest-growing cohort entering homelessness, with one-third moving into older-age poverty.
Intersectional issues compound disadvantage and inequity for women, particularly those from culturally and linguistically diverse populations, and non-English-speaking backgrounds.
“Furthermore, women exposed to family violence are at greater risk of poorer mental health and, in turn, women with mental health issues are at higher risk of experiencing gender-based violence,” says Professor Megan Galbally, Professor of Psychiatry at Monash Health.
“Structural inequities then penalise women who have experienced and sought treatment for their mental health, including in the family court system.”
Women in family violence situations can also face barriers to accessing mental healthcare, including as a result of coercive control.
We assert that more broad structural reforms will be needed, in addition to accessible mental health services that understand the impact of gender-based violence on mental health, and are responsive to the needs of women.
“Psychological sessions, currently accessible to the more affluent in our community, will not help our most underserved women to put a meal on the table, pay the rent or necessarily escape gender-based violence,” says Professor Helena Teede, Professor of Research with the Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation.
With the high prevalence of psychological distress and mental health disorders, population-level policies and strategies will be critical, alongside individual-level mental health services provided by a broader workforce and greater accessibility for the most underserved populations.
To ensure this occurs, we’ve proposed a National Institute for Equity and Women’s Health.
It’s time to understand the factors that influence health outcomes, and implement and evaluate evidence-based policy levers and structural reforms to reduce mental distress, as well as reforming mental health services.
The proposed institute will target those most in need, including women and those most financially insecure.
About the Authors
-
Helena teede
Professor (Research), Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation
Helena is a clinician, academic and leader. She's an endocrinologist with a focus on women's metabolic and reproductive health through mechanistic, clinical, health services and public health research into practice and policy. She's strongly committed to broad stakeholder engagement in health reform and service innovation, and is passionate about research and evidence translation into healthcare to improve health outcomes.
-
Joanne enticott
Associate professor, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), Monash University
Joanne specialises in translational clinical and health services research, data-driven research, big data and analytics. She is a Data Driven Fellow at Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, leading work on Learning Health System development. She leads a statistical team supporting biostatistics needs of more than 200 researchers at two Centres of Research Excellence and Monash Centre for Health Research & Implementation (MCHRI).
-
Megan galbally
Professor and Director of the Centre for Women’s and Children’s Mental Health, Monash University School of Clinical Sciences
Megan’s research focus is understanding the relationship between maternal mental health and child mental health and developmental outcomes. Her interests also extend to early women's mental health, including the relationship between childhood trauma, domestic violence and mental health, parenting practices (breastfeeding, infant and maternal sleep, parent-child relationship) and mental health and models of antenatal care for women with Eating Disorders, Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.
-
Graham meadows
Professor of Psychiatry, Monash Health, Monash University
Graham has three adjunct professorial roles with Monash University. These are in the School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, The School of Primary and Allied Health Care, and the School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine. He is a prominent figure in innovation and evaluation in mental health care in Australia, with national and international profiles in areas such as GP shared care, resource distribution, applications of mindfulness in clinical mental health practice, and recovery-oriented practice. His research, clinical leadership, policy advisory and training activities have reflected continuing commitment to a value base including equity, empowerment, efficiency and sound use of evidence at all levels of healthcare delivery and planning.
Other stories you might like
-
Senate submission to raise the bar in reproductive healthcare
It’s hoped the results of a broad, first-of-its-kind Australian government inquiry will lead to strong legal frameworks regarding abortion and contraception access.
-
Menopause meets politics: Where governments fail in women’s health
About 10% of Australian women experience early menopause before the age of 45, yet it's an aspect of women's health to which state and federal governments pay little more than lip service.
-
The federal budget through a gender lens
The October 2022 budget marks a departure from the “blokier” budgets of recent years, centring gender equality and the care economy rather than high-vis and hard hats.
-
Women, work and the poverty trap
Single Australian women over 60 are the most likely to live in poverty, earning less than $30,000 a year, and it's taking a heavy emotional toll, with mental distress on the rise.