Australia has just been handed a map for getting to net zero. Here’s how it will guide us
Malos
Australia’s push for net zero emissions received a welcome boost yesterday, with the release of an official report showing how Australia can seek to cut domestic emissions across each sector of the economy.
The Climate Change Authority prepared the report, which provides vital scaffolding for Australia’s climate ambitions. Hopefully, it will inform the Australian government’s upcoming decarbonisation plans for each sector of the economy, and its updated goal for emissions reduction out to 2035.
The pathways laid out by the authority show how emissions cuts can be made in sectors such as land use, resources, transport and energy. Importantly, the report shows what effective climate action looks like – and what Australia can achieve.
The roadmap also shows how Australia can do its part to limit global warming to 1.5°C to avoid temperatures climbing dangerously higher. Climate scientists are clear – every fraction of a degree matters.
Why are these pathways important?
The authority groups Australia’s domestic emissions into six categories: electricity and energy, transport, industry and waste, agriculture and land, built environment, and resources.
For each sector of Australia’s economy, getting emissions to net zero poses different challenges and opportunities.
Preventing emissions from buildings requires, among other things, getting off gas and making them more efficient. Reducing emissions from transport means encouraging uptake of diverse solutions such as electric vehicles, trains and cycling.
The report provides pathways that can guide the decarbonisation of each sector. It shows which technologies could be taken up and phased out, how to attract, enable and time investments, and how to align policy with practical implementation.
The authority borrows from the approach of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, by showing a range of possible routes to net zero and comparing their work to others.
We hope the Australian government continues this approach, to ensure decision-makers understand how different modelling approaches and scenarios combine to create a robust body of knowledge.
Pathways show us the way
We’ve spent more than a decade doing work similar to the report just released. Our own sectoral pathways are also designed to support governments, businesses and investors as they look for opportunities to reduce emissions.
Decision-makers around the world are calling for such guidance.
Why? Because pathways create a signal of how things can change. Laying out the problem, and different approaches to solving it, helps create a common understanding of the opportunities, risks and barriers to effective action.
They make it possible for governments to set clear goals and ensure policies match what’s needed and are backed by evidence. Rather than just setting out the overarching intention of, say, cutting emissions in half in a decade, pathways show how it can be done.
Pathways let investors and companies identify and reduce risks, and get ahead in a global economy aiming for net zero emissions.
And they lay out the technologies and processes needed to make the shift, ranging from mature, ready-to-deploy technologies such as renewable energy and storage, to maturing technologies such as green steelmaking.
Pathways to keep 1.5°C alive
Early next year, the Australian government is expected to release its new 2035 emissions target, taking us beyond the current target for 2030.
Every signatory to the 2015 Paris Agreement has to publicly set a new target every five years. Other nations are doing the same.
In the authority’s plan, Australia would hit net zero by 2040 under the more ambitious pathway aimed at meeting the 1.5°C goal, or 2050 under the 2°C scenario. These net zero dates are broadly consistent with our own analysis.
But there are opportunities to move faster still.
Boosted ambitions
Transport is now Australia’s fastest-growing source of emissions. The authority’s transport pathway envisages passenger vehicles going electric, and encouraging public transport and active transport, such as walking, cycling, and micromobility such as e-scooters.
It aligns with our research, which shows a diverse solutions approach is a better option to reduce transport emissions. This is especially important given recent delays in the shift to zero-emissions vehicles.
However, the authority only takes a diverse approach to passenger transport. Our own work shows Australia can diversify its approach to freight transport.
The authority focuses on moving trucks from diesel and petrol to battery electric and green hydrogen. But Climateworks’ analysis shows we can also reduce distance travelled through route optimisation and shift freight to rail, where possible.
For the built environment – our houses, offices and infrastructure – the report rightly notes most technologies are now technically ready, commercially available, cheaper to run, and healthier. They include energy-efficient electrical appliances, roof and wall insulation, and window glazing.
But there’s an opportunity to go further.
The most cost-effective way to green your house depends on which state or territory you live in. Quick fixes – such as switching gas hot water for heat pumps – are included in the authority’s report.
But as our recent modelling shows, homes in cooler climates benefit from more comprehensive improvements, including double-glazing windows and adding insulation to walls and ceilings, alongside the quick fixes.
What’s next?
The pathways laid out by the Climate Change Authority in this report will not just be left on the shelf. They have very real use for business leaders and investors, as well as for policymakers.
These pathways will guide Australia’s comprehensive national net zero plan. They give us a starting point and show us how it can be done.
This article originally appeared on The Conversation.
About the Authors
-
Anna malos
Policy Manager, Climateworks Centre
Anna works on a range of ClimateWorks projects with a focus on the policy implications of its work. Prior to ClimateWorks, she was assistant director at the Climate Change Authority. She also worked on climate policy in the non-government sector, including as director of Climate Action Network Australia and in the Victorian government. Her climate policy expertise builds on her policy roles in London government on environment and sustainable development. She also has experience in international development, including in Latin America, and in urban conservation.
-
Matthew benetti
Policy Manager (Energy), Climateworks Centre, MSDI, Monash University
Matthew provides expert policy advice designed to accelerate Australia’s transition to clean energy. He informs and supports system teams and external stakeholders as they work to decarbonise the grid and implement net-zero industries, transport and buildings. His experience in government, working on consumer energy resources, energy innovation and providing precise and practical policy guidance, means he is well placed to advise decision makers on the renewables transformation.
-
Josh solomonsz
Policy Coordinator, Climateworks Centre, MSDI, Monash University
Other stories you might like
-
Why the conversation about eco-anxiety needs some heat
Low awareness of the link between heat and eco-anxiety in Indonesia requires a more comprehensive strategy in the campaign.
-
Striking a balance between social purpose and corporate profit
Businesses are facing increasing pressure to address major global challenges such as climate change, poverty, and healthcare access. But can companies really make a difference while still turning a profit?
-
The paradigm shift needed to address growing global fragility
Complex and interconnected threats to global peace and security demands innovative and interconnected thinking by experts working across academic disciplines and industry sectors.
-
Can the tide be turned on Australian climate action?
Why have successive Australian governments found it so difficult to truly embrace the country’s potential to become a clean energy superpower?